While i voted "don't care", because people are free to do what they want (it's not like humans are an endangered species whereby homosexuality would threaten our continued existance).But herein lies the non-religious objection a lot of people have. Homosexuality serves no natural purpose in so far as what life *is*, but makes a lot of sense on a personal level. Physical expression of love with no intent to procreate is a uniquely human trait (in animals it's supposedly instinctual - but we won't know for sure until we actually speak to one). This argument falls flat on it's face when you consider that all we do is natural, since we're part of nature (it doesn't define us, we define it). Maybe homosexuality is a natural way humans respond to overpopulation? Fun thought, but unlikely considering how very gay ancinent Greeks were. TLDR: I'm not against gay marriage / civil union, but understand completely why some people have non-religious objections to any kind of homosexual union.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
