BasilZero said:
fordy said:
think-man said:
fordy said:
think-man said:
Im not against gay marriage, but I am against gays/lesbians having kids together. It's just not fare on the kids who will have to grow up in a house that is different from 95% of the population. |
So you'd prefer them to stay in orphanages where they feel like nobody loves them? What about to hetero couples that always fight, or are physically abusive? Would that be a better place to raise kids?
|
Im more talking about when they give sperm and have another women bare there child, or lesbians getting a sperm donor to make themselves pregnant.
Nowadays ( Well at least in my country) the familys go through extensive investigation to make sure they are fit to adopt a child, as well as support workers dropping by every couple of weeks to make sure everythings fine.
|
If they're going to a loving household, why should it make a difference?
|
What gives you the notion that all heterosexual relationships (not saying you are saying it directly but the way you worded about it seems like that way) have a negative background like that and none of the homosexual relationships have it?
All types of relationships have issues - pretty sure there are background checks to see people's histories to see if there are actually problems before an adoption.
|
Where in my question does it imply that? I was stating that it's better for a child to be in a loving household, regardless of parents.
