| oniyide said: im not suggesting anything, im telling you thats what happened. Its well known that IW didnt care about the Wii, Activision could have made them do it, but seeing how IW was THERE dev studio they had more leeway, ALOT more leeway than Treyarch. |
Not sure what you mean by "THERE dev studio", but Activision owns Infinity Ward. More importantly, Activision doesn't have a problem with bringing in secondary studios to work on other versions of games - they could easily have gotten Eurocom, Treyarch, or one of a variety of other studios to work on the Wii version of Modern Warfare. They didn't do it. The lack of motivation wasn't just on Infinity Ward's part, but also Activision's part. When IW said "We want to make this new CoD, called Modern Warfare, for the PS3 and 360", Activision didn't go "Would you be able to make a Wii version, too?", they went "Sounds good, do it".
Yet Treyarch were more than happy to make a Wii version of World at War. Why? What was different? Do you really think that Activision would intentionally allow IW to not make a Wii version of MW, and then tell Treyarch that they HAD to make a Wii version of WaW? It just doesn't fit.
