By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
sc94597 on 08 January 2013
Edit Thread
Runa216 said:
killerzX said:
sc94597 said:
KylieDog said:
NobleTeam360 said:
No why should everyone suffer because a few decide to go on a killing spree? 


Yeah people will really suffer by not having assault rifles at home.  Can you imagine living without an assault rifle, what a struggle

Holy shit, please educate yourself at least. This topic has been discussed for the last month and you still think an assault weapon = assault rifle.

both are made up terms, 'assault weapon' is just more made up. it is a term conjured up by anti-constitutionalist, progressive statist hoplophobes, soley to disingenously confuse the low information voter into thinking certain black guns a more deadly than some gun with wooden furniture.

wow....anti-constitutionalist?  you people will make up ANY word to discredit those who disagree with you, won't you?

What'd'ya mean? The people who did coin these terms have had a history of not only disregarding the second amendment, but the other ones as well. Diane Feinstein for example, argued against the amendments to the FISA legislation this past December, which would make the government more accountable to the fourth amendment. They'd be quite happy if the constitution was revised to give them more power. Not to blame them though, that's the natural progression, and the federal government is inherently against a constitution which doesn't give them the power they want. Hence, they're "anti-constitutionalist."