Mr Khan said:
Simple: if it isn't a handgun and isn't expressly for the purpose of hunting, it's an assault weapon that nobody who doesn't want to foment rebellion has any legitimate business owning. |
dear lord where is the hunting clause in the constititon. 2nd who determines what an "expressly" hunting only rifle" is?
is my ruger 10-22 "expressly for the purpose of hunting" ? i really dont know. it looks like your stereotypical hunting rifle, it has the word furniture of you typical hunting rifle, it doesnt even have a pistol grip. but is it "expressly for hunting". i doubt it. but I guess by your definition, if I assaulted somebody with it, it still wouldnt be an "assault weapon". but my big scary, black Ak-47, is an "assault weapon" even if it never harmed a soul.
Essay Pro