By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
EdHieron said:
Jay520 said:
EdHieron said:

"But why would fans of games like "Uncharted", "The Last of Us", and "Beyond: Two Souls" be interested in buying a $400.00 console that isn't really going to offer much of an improvement over what's available on PS3?"

1. Aside from Uncharted, I'm not sure if there are many fans of those games, at least not enough to drastically effect Sony's strategy.

2. Most gamers don't actually care about graphics.

3. What makes you think a $400 2013 console won't offer much of an improvement over the PS3 which is barely more powerful than a $400 2005 console ( the 360)

1.  Considering the consoles based on graphics horsepower had over 50% of this console generation's marketshare, I would say that's a significant indicator right there.

2.  Considering the consoles based on graphics horsepower had over 50% of this console generation's marketshare, I would say that's a significant indicator right there.

3.  Because at $300.00 the Wii U doesn't.


1. That has nothing to do with what I just said. We don't if there will be many fans of Beyond and TLoU.

2. Sony doesn't share success with Microsoft, so it makes no sense to combine their accomplishments to show what Sony should do. Sony's success is dependent on the individual accomplishments of their platform. Being the least selling console of the three, it's safe to say the power route did not pay off. In fact, looking at this generation, power has shown to be a negative correlation with sales.

Also, the best selling game on the HD console is Call of Duty - not a game focused on graphics, huh?

3. $100 was spent on the Wii U's tablet, so you might as well call it a $200 Wii U when referring to power..