J_Allard on 06 January 2013
| JoeTheBro said: I have a question for GOLD defenders. I'm a subscriber myself but I think it's stupid. My question is what would you think if Sony stopped including online passes in new games? This means even if you buy cod day one you still needed to pay an extra $10 for the online pass. That's just stupid, yet exactly what GOLD does. If you buy 6 xbox games a year that is equivalent to $10 a game for GOLD. Why the fudge would you agree with that? I can understand subscribing because you prefer live or need to play halo online, but you are retarded to try and defend the cost. It's moronic. |
The only thing "moronic" is paying for a service you admit that you think is dumb.
Your analogy doesn't really work because
a. Sony doesn't control CoD, the only franchises they can force online passes on are their own franchises, which no one cares about mostly
b. In your scenario you're still getting an online pass to a PSN network that pales in comparison to Live
c. You can pretty much always get Live deals for $35-40 for a year subscription
I don't know why it's so hard for people to understand that some people don't mind paying for a superior service.
