Sony needs to drop Dust 514 and create a shooter from scratch

[MARCUSDJACKSON]

S.T.A.G.E. said:

MARCUSDJACKSON said:

S.T.A.G.E. said:

MARCUSDJACKSON said:
shooters just aren't Sony's game this gen.

i don't think Sony should scrap Dust514. they should give dust a shot, and if it averages out, get the dev's of Dust to create a console shooter.

in-listing former bungie, infinity ward, ect people, doesn't guarantee anything. S.T.A.G.E. wishful thinking isn't your thing.

id say Sony should in-list, Platinum games, Visceral Games, a deal with epic for people can fly, or Crytec.

maybe even get lightbox interactive to create a shooter not related to starhawk.

Wishful thinking? Have you played Halo 4? Microsoft spared no expense to get the best of the best to breathe new life into Halo but keep Halo the way he knew it in gameplay. Dust looks old and dated, exactly like what you would expect from a free to play game. The movement seems clunky amongst other issues. In listing from Bungie and Infinity Ward doesn't guarantee anything, but it gives Sony a fighting chance. Crytek is in good with Microsoft so I dont think they are about to help Sony with anything but yes recruit the top members of those teams who have departed. I'll hire light box interactive to STFU. 

i hate Halo. i've yet to play 4 but Reach to me is the best one, and that's not saying much. hey! atleastnit's better then COD lol.

agreed.

STFU?

Best Halo since part three. I wasnt a fan of Reach at all.

i'll say this for Reach. it wasn't Halo. Reach was trying to do something(outside the campaign) that Bungie should have tried doing with whatever new game they are working on.

the first thing i play'd was the offline multiplayer, and after having not played a shooter in a yr. came in second. i had no idea how to do anything but shoot, and this was against guys that played avidly daily, but that doesn't mean i had no idea of what i was doing.

these guys get onlline and dominate. the idea was to take down KZ which kept coming in second lol. but i only came in second cause i killed the least and died the least. sometimes 24-12 or 12-4 lol. most the times being the only one with a positive record and always having a positive record. 

can't say that much for KZ lol.

most the battles i had were long range.

i played online a few times but the last time was the worse. i hadn't played a shooter in 4-6 months, and i was the only one to get any kills. but going 2 and (what ever the number was it was bad) out isn't anything to bragg about.

4 matches and only 2 kills in each match. the last 3 i managed not to die lol. all that extra crap was not Halo and shouldn't have been added in Reach.

again, me saying Reach is the best of the ones i've played, isn't saying much. i did the official Pre E3 Halo4 thread and liked wht i saw so i'll get my hands on 4 sometime soon. i'd likely have played it after christmas, if my brothr-inlaws brother wouldn't have tried to still it when his mother was buying it.

needless to say she opted out of the purchase.