How many of you really own a PS3?

[Tispower]

I don't get it when people say they don't need/want Blu-Ray, don't forget that the PS3 games also use it, and that has the advantage in games such as R:FOM of having one of the longest single player campaign I know of, it takes at least 15+ hours I would say to play it all the way through, and that's not bad for something thats not much more expensive than a PS2 game, if not the same price depending where you get it; as you get a huge amount of playability becuase of the extra space of Blu-Ray, not even taking into account the online multiplayer. So even if the xBox 360 keeps up in terms of graphics, it won't be able to keep up in terms of the amount of game you get as it were. However I'm not sure about the Wii, because even though it uses DVDs (think that's correct?), it's not filling up the space with the xBox/PS3 graphics etc, so you'll proabably get as much video games with a Wii, possibly, as a PS3. Also even the PS2 used DVD, and on the last Ace Combat game, I remember that you could pretty much complete the game within I would say max 4 hours (I'm using that as an example as it was released on the PS2 later on, so it's likely that Namco were taking full advantage of the available hardware, and therefore likely filling the DVD up), so if that was happening last gen, with last gen graphics, I fear what's going to happen for the xBox, possibly the Wii, does that mean with improved graphics we are going to get even less game for our money.