| runqvist said:
1) We are going with your definitions, first you defined a group called "graphic whores" and then you made up a group who bought wii for wiimote. Those are 2 different things. 2) I have never argued that nor even commented on that. You on the other hand made a comment about people who whined about lack of good games and haven't answered that. I even helped you with your own definitions and still no answer. Then you ask a question which makes no sense whatsoever on the context our exchange and expect me to answer it?
The crickets are getting tired, maybe I should call the tumbleweed? The games, please? |
1) Going back to my first post:
| HappySqurriel said:
Personally, I would argue that Nintendo isn't having problems with the so-called "casual" gamers because I see evidence that social gamers, lapsed gamers, "girl gamers", and whatnot are buying the system in decent numbers. Where I see the sales falling short is the elitest graphic-whore gamer who previously bought the Wii to try it out, and then spent 5 years complaining that it was collecting dust while refusing to buy good games on the system. |
If you notice, I'm talking about a group of gamers who bought into the Wii due to the Wiimote (because it was cool technology at the time) and were unhappy with the graphical technology and capabilities. How is this different then technology obsessed people who bought the Wii to try the Wiimote because it was cool technology at the time and were unhappy with the graphical technology and capabilities?
