By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
dsgrue3 on 04 January 2013
Edit Thread
JayWood2010 said:
dsgrue3 said:
It isn't about the money.

"Cordoning off entire sections of a game from people who paid good money for that product is indefensible"

This sums up what I've tried to convey. Can you address this and not the service itself?

I'm not going to get in an argument about this.  All I'm saying is XBL is a good service and that can't be denied.  Whether you want to buy it or not is your choice.  I've put countless hours into XBLG this generation and I've barely touched other services that use online.  That to me makes it all worth it.  Free is cool but I don't see them going that route, but instead they will continue to add value to it's service.  You are not going to convince people other wise.  They will either agree with you or they won't.  There is not much of a middle ground on this subject.

I don't want an argument, just want you to address that particular point to understand your thoughts on it as opposed to the big picture.

Specifically, I want you to address locking multiplayer content. I'm sure the entire XBLG service is great, but multiplayer content should be separated from it as that has next to nothing to do with MS and everything to do with the devs themselves that created that content.