The Ps3 will FINALLY pass the xbox360 at some point,so what,s the big deal?it,s only 2013

[sales2099]

dsgrue3 said:

sales2099 said:
Lifetime sales. 

Gen over gen marketshare, 3rd party support, profit.....all things MS gained. Again still more lifetime sales and will have them in time for next Xbox to come out. PS3 can claw and scratch its way to 2nd place and you can celebrate, but your lowering the bar for your kind. Its loose loose, so I guess you gotta celebrate something.

PS......your flattering signature is wrong in that my sig is something that gets people into instant passionate debates. Your sig is something nobody cares about. Whatever point your trying to make is moot because people cared more about my sig then yours.

Someone else already mentioned those things, I've addressed them in that post. Feel free to read it or not.

You miss the point of my sig. You are comparing sales for a game from 2010, to not 1, but 2 other games from 2011 and 2012. A valid comparison would be lifetime sales as most games sales occur within the first year of release. In other words, it is a stupid and meaningless comparison.

Not really, you are willing to bet that PS3 will take 2nd before next Xbox is out, which I doubt given low sales of non-holiday months and MS doing a price drop mid-year to make way for next generation.You also waive your hand at MS and Sony financial statements because 360 and PS3 are grouped with other devices. But we do know that MS has made profit on Xbox far sooner then PS3 did and PS3s 2006-2009 net losses far outweigh 360s initial losses and the RROD thingy.

You say PS3 sold more since 2008, but I say 360 has more lifetime sales throughout it all. PS3 can claw its way year after year no problem, but 360 was 2nd place the entire time, and again made tons more improvements gen over gen.

My sig is comparing 2 IPs. Just happens that the last GT game was released in 2010. Not my problem. Your comparing 2 IPs that nobody really compares anymore or debates about seriously. Thats where your sig is wrong. Relevance is key.