happydolphin said:
It's hard not to lump you in with the others because you use the same slurs "Don't post ridiculous comments" and the good old rhetoric. But okay, not that you told me I'll make an effort to think of you as a separate thought altogether. As for the driven nature of evolution, that's not what I learned from the theory. What I learned was that, given natural selection, certain random mutations take precedence in persistence over others. How is that driven other than by natural selection, which in and of itself is more of a filter than a logical process. Tell me if I'm wrong, because it seems like with every different person a new perception of evolution is shared with me. |
Evolutionary changes are absolutely driven. You are clueless. Here's a very short document explaining why no one takes you seriously.
And a more in-depth document concerning speciation (I think this will rebut any future questions of inbreeding/cross-breeding):
http://www.globalchange.umich.edu/globalchange1/current/lectures/speciation/speciation.html
PS: You ignored my previous post to you.
