Gun control debate issues that bother me. Will Libertarians and Republicans please address these?

[the2real4mafol]

killerzX said:

the2real4mafol said:

If anything the amount of guns you have should be restricted, as should the amount of ammo available at a single time. i'm personally against gun, but am willing to compromise. Although that NRA guy is a nut

so Bill clinton, and pretty much every democratic politician is nuts too? because suggesting police officers be at schools isnt a new or controversial idea, until now that is. but thats only because the NRA proposed an idea, that pretty much everybody supported in the first place. Bill Clinton suggested this a decade ago.

an even more reasonable and cost effective idea, would be to actually allow teachers not have to shed their rights at the school doors, and allow them to protect themselves, and their students.

remind me again, how having a police officer at a school is nuts?

 

anyway, how is me having 4 guns any more deadly than me having 1. can i somehow kill 4 timez as manyz people with 4 gunz! as oppossed to 1 gun. What if a guy had 50 gunzz, he could kill like a gazzilion peoplez!!! if i wanted to kill a bunch of people, i wouldnt use a dozens of guns because i cant use them all, I can only use 1 at a time. i would use a max 2 guns, a pistol and a carbine.

and what kind of limit would you put on ammo? because 99% of homocides involving guns, only have one victim, so that means 1 bullet is needed. would you limit it to 10, 100, 1000. how is that going to work. a bad guy only needs 1. but with this, not thought out proposal of yours, you would only harm people like me, who use hundreds of bullets at a time when I go to the range. So unless you want to make my range time suck by limiting me to a bullet or 2, and make purchases an awful and frequent experience, by not allowing me to buy in bulk like i do know, i have like 5000 rounds of ammuntion stored up. im not planning on using that to kill 5000 people.

well maybe they are, because people generally don't want to grow up and live in an armed society. It's not having a police officer at the schools that's nuts, it's the fact that the guy said they need to be armed, that is nuts. Surely, there is a greater risk for injury and mistakes, if you carry a gun around, as much as it's supposed to protect. And who's saying these armed police officers would protect the schools? What if they went mental and started a rampage? People can change easily, if there life is shit.

But i would limit to just 2 magazines of ammo, unless it's proven to be for leisure of any kind.

I'm sure you wouldn't go on a massacre, but how are other people to know? people can go hostile quickly, although most people are generally sane.

i'm just anti-gun and live in a anti-gun country