oniyide said:
MentalAlliance said:
I was originally going to count my Tales of Graces f as partially exclusive, but I was unsure about Vesperia. I guess it could be in the same category though considering it's the original version and not the version that has the added content, technically. So for those two I guess it's arguable that they can be placed in the "partially exclusive" category, but one that was identical on multiple platforms in Japan, but was exclusive in NA is Deadly Premonition, so I'm not sure how to classify it. Really though, I think all three of the games I mentioned should just count as exclusive because there is no way I would have gotten them on another system. Besides, exclusives are system sellers and the reason I have a 360 and a PS3 is because of Vesperia and Graces f.
The reason I'm taking this so seriously is because it's very important that we all get this information right. If we don't, the Mayans will just start using the incorrect classification of game exclusivity as another excuse for the world ending.
|
actually, Deadly Premonition is getting a PS3 port in the US? sometime early 2013
|
Yeah, I'm aware (I'm getting it day one :D), but it's not exactly out yet and doesn't exactly have a whole lot of release info other than 2013 and $40. Though, I guess it's really only fair to consider it timed exclusive, but that will eventually make my collection a little weird (at least to me) because Deadly Premonition will be considered a timed exclusive on my 360, but when I get it on my PS3 it will be considered partially exclusive due to it being the director's cut. I dunno. This whole exclusivity classification is silly anyway. I feel eager to just classify them however the hell I want to, which for all I know is what everyone else is doing considering no one's showing what they are classifying their games as individually (which would be a pointless waste of time anyway).
