sc94597 said:
Millions of Americans and the founders disagreed. It's a right which can be taken away, yes, but its a right nevertheless. To own a gun one does not need permission, nor should one need permission to defend themselves. The constitution tells the federal government what it CAN do. The Bill of Rights is just an explicit notation of inherent rights all people inherently knew about, and even the founding fathers viewed it as redundant, because certainly these things are common sense. You might disagree that owning a gun enables one to defend themself and therefore falls under the right to life and the right to self-defence; and if you and many others do you can repeal the second amendment. However; the illegal means by which these laws are made, not aligned with the ocnstitution and not fullfilling the appealing process is illegal and treason ( yes, treason) to the oath these officals have made to the U.S Constitution. Go to Nazi Germany, today's Middle East, Stalin Russia, and tell them that guns are not necessary to secure their lives and I'm sure they'd (if given the freedom to do so) would disagree. The man who has the gun has power. |
i own this htread and i lock it and ban you ya fool and you are the worst troll
