By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
BenVTrigger on 28 December 2012
Edit Thread
CGI-Quality said:
BenVTrigger said:
CGI-Quality said:

God, this was the EXACT same problem of Killzone 3 vs Crysis 2, and people were defiant in their defense of the latter. I honestly can't judge Far Cry 3 vs Halo 4 (I haven't played Halo 4 yet), but if it's as you put it, I can understand why people are adamant about it vs Far Cry 3.


Yeah I think Killzone 3 is certainly better than Crysis 2.

It sounds like Im hating on Far Cry 3 on 360 but Im really not.  Its a great game and beautiful a lot of the time but the game seriius suffers from some technical issues, the worst of which is screen tearing.  Its everywhere all over the place to the point of actually being distracting.  One of the things that really sold Halo 4 is how beautifulky the game runs.  Its true 720 without any of the issues Far Cry 3 suffers from.

I haven't seen it on 360 yet, but I can believe it. I have the PC version and because of the type of graphics card I use, the game will not take advantage of the SLI profile. Sure, I can adjust it in the NVIDIA control panel, but I shouldn't have to. I've also seen it on PS3, and while it's graphically excellent standing against the PC, I saw plenty of major frame rate drops.


Yep pretty much.  I bet its gorgeous on PC but really on console its got some big performance problems.  Still beautiful but far too flawed when compared to Halo 4.  To me Halo 4 is best looking FPS this gen and top 3 overall with God of War 3 and Uncharted 3.  Far Cry 3 isnt even top 10 IMO on console.  I dont really blame the developer though, I just think the hardware on PS3 and 360 is just really starting to show its age outside of optomized 1st party big budget games.  Gears Judgement, GOW Ascension, Last of Us, and Beyond will all look great but at this point we really need new consoles next year, the gap between console and PC is giant now and it shows with titles like Far Cry 3