godf on 11 February 2008
If you didn't change what you meant, your original reply to Andir was utterly irrelevent and misleading.
Andir did not insist on "God to prove his existence undeniably", that was you. And you then went on to criticise that notion.
You claimed "your scenario has two possibile outcomes", seemingly concluding it would be impossible for acumen to have a chat with God and decide he was real, without surrendering his free will.
How could you possibly justify that conclusion?
