By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
theprof00 said:
JayWood2010 said:
theprof00 said:
JayWood2010 said:
theprof00 said:
@jay
im not saying those games aren't bundled. I'm saying that they weren't bundled together until now. Take the 2008 360 arcade bundled with lego indy and kungfu panda. 2 games.

the first one sony fid was 2009 for black friday, and another one in 2011.

i expect all the 360 owners are in here becsuse they're interested in buying. There are more 360 owners here than ps3 fanboys (just me) :D

 

Then we are talking about two entirely different things.  I'm talking about bundles in general and the myth that the reason Nintendo and MSFT games sell well.  All it is is a big excuse.  It could be that they are good games that they sell well O.O  Oh my I would have never thought such a thing!  If sony fans are going to complain about bundles then you might as well say the games i've mentioned above are not worthy of their sells either.

Logically, I would not be able to assume a viewpoint I didn't have, so naturally, you can't take my posts as if I have been saying that 360 doesn't deserve its game sales.

Perhaps you've misinterpreted? What I did say was that was something I've said when it was pointed out how many more million sellers 360 had than ps3. If you took it as "360 only sells games because they're always bundled", I would understand where you're coming from, but let me clarify that in my words, the desired interpretation was "ps3 million sellers are only outnumbered because of bundles". As you can see, if MS bundles 2 games, and Sony bundles 1, then obviously there are going to be more million sellers.


You are the exact reason I pointed out the bundle issue lol  As i said before bundles are not exclusive to nintendo and MSFT so the quicker you realize this the quicker you will see what i mean.

I assume you mean "you" as in the grammatical "you understood"...


Whatever you say man.  I don't want to argue.