Monarchy, are they really born to rule and why we need them?

[RoryGamesFree]

Pyro as Bill said:

RoryGamesFree said:

Soleron said:
Our Queen fulfills all the roles of a President as head of state with the same costs, but also creates tourism and promotes the UK brand worldwide. There's no good economic argument for replacement, and as long as she has no power and doesn't speak out on day-to-day politics I'm OK with it.

the tourism argument is horseshit, as if people only come here because of her, you don't meet the old bag by coming to London ffs. 

got nout to do with economics, it's to do with democracy and elitism, but if you find inequality in society okay then enjoy being a subject and essentially endorsing slavery by all means.

If your democracy is so precious to you, you'll have nothing to complain about when we overwhelmingly vote to keep the monarchy and execute any traitors/republicans.

only people need exectuing are idiots like you for stupidity, you know fuck all about anything clearly. want to live in a cuntocracy then fuck off to North Korea and such on Kim's dick like her majestey's tits.

 

>User was moderated for this post [RH]