ClassicGamingWizzz said:
want to bet or not?
btw your article :
"If there's one complaint to level at the smoothness of the game, it comes down to the lack of motion blur. The camera and object-based effects we see implemented in the top-tier Sony first party games (Uncharted, Killzone, God of War) help to mitigate the judder typically associated with a 30FPS update, and could have made a difference here. Its omission is understandable bearing in mind the sustained performance levels and the rendering features we do get."
"In an era where the likes of Naughty Dog and Sony Santa Monica have defined the graphical state-of-the-art with Uncharted and God of War, Xbox 360 finally has its own shot at the title - and it's a genuinely worthwhile, lavish and occasionally even breathtaking experience."
this is when they speak of other games and you say :
" Yes undoubtedly DF classes it right ip alongside UC3 if not better. That is 100% clear"
100 % clear what they say about shot at the title
they never mention killzone 3 and that does not mean they think halo 4 is better in graphics.
if there is someone here spinning its you.
And to make clear i love the graphics and art style of halo 4 from the footage i saw ;)
edited : sorry if we shattered that world where you live , but damn , you are one hell of character , i know that dude insulted you he should laugh instead of raging like we all do .
have a nice day sir
|
Not to mention this in the article
"Remember that feeling you had when playing the first 20 minutes of God of War 3 for the first time? The sensation that the developers had somehow extracted next-gen visuals from current gen hardware? While Halo 4 doesn't quite engender that feeling of hushed awe, it gets very, very close"
In other words: Very Close, but not quite there.
And thats a game from early 2010 and not UC3 :)
