Do we really need to kill animals??

[Dr.Grass]

ganoncrotch said:

Dr.Grass said:

dahuman said:
Some people just have too much time on their hands, if he grew up hungry as shit then he'll eat whatever he can get his hands on including all the meats! :) I'm also pro-cannibalism if we have nothing left to eat for survival for as long as it's fully cooked. The problem is also if all we eat only plants and don't touch animals, we'd run into another problem which would result in overall lower vegetation on the planet which would fuck our human eco system which would end result in pro-hunting and meat eating lol. I think we have a pretty good balance so far.

You'll also excuse me if I don't care about cows being raped by metal insertions if it gives people jobs and give grown ups something to drink since we don't exactly want to suck on our women's tits after they got a baby in them, goat milk is better than cow milk BTW, we should just go that route in the masses IMO.

Are you people really that poorly informed!?

I CAN LIVE ALL YEAR ROUND on 10 square meters of land!

DO YOU KNOW HOW MANY RESOURCES A SINGLE KG OF STEAK REQUIRES!!?

(I'm screaming because you wouldn't hear me otherwise)

I don't use a text to speech program but even if I did most don't distinguish between capital letters and small letters in terms of the volume produced, 10 square meters of land is actually a fair enough amount btw given how efficient farms are now with their use of land to feed the 6billion people each year, would need 60billion square meters for your diet for each person. This is of course not including the obvious things such as irrigation and trees needed for wood to grow the tools you must be using out there on your plot, of course you wouldn't use a wooden bucket to water them would you so you'd need some plastic plant on that 10meter plot, gonna get pretty tight.

I must say btw each time you start a sentence with "oh you humans are all such..." I can't help but read it as Edward Cullin would talking to bella :<

"10 square meters of land is actually a fair enough amount btw given how efficient farms are now with their use of land to feed the 6billion people each year, would need 60billion square meters for your diet for each person."

I've been researching this topic in depth for over 8 years. 

You really don't know what you are talking about at all. This is the problem with these internet forums - you can't really be exposed for the all-knowing-fool you are and can just blindly spew your shit in all directions. Consequently, legions of similarly mindless drones start attaching weight to your words.

Ok, let's get something short enough so the average attention span can actually take it in.

From the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition: ( http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/78/3/660S.long )

"The meat-based food system requires more energy, land, and water resources than the lactoovovegetarian diet. In this limited sense, the lactoovovegetarian diet is more sustainable than the average American meat-based diet."