sergiodaly said:
keroncoward said:
sergiodaly said:
Nem said:
I find it funny how 1.25 CPU is slow and 1.6 is fast. Only in the internet... its those 350Mhz that make the difference!
It might be easier for people to say Nintendo is slow and Microsoft is fast! Its about as obvious that theres no logic to it.
|
3 cores @1.25 is (not a little bit, a lot) slower than 8 or 16 cores @ 1.6
here in the internet and everywhere.
i don't get what is so difficult to understand...
|
Different cores can process different amounts, it doesn't matter how many of them you have so much as it matters the total amount it all produces.
|
so... low number of cores with low speed produces the same as more core count at higher speed??????
|
Archetecture........VLSI engineering is very important and no one here seems to ever mention that. I understand what youre saying and i agree the new Xbox will have a better cpu than the Wii U obviously but lets not quickly jump to the conclusion that it will be a lot more powerful . Lets be real here a lot of people were comparing clock speeds and deeming the Wii U's cpu slower than the Xbox360 which is absolute rubbish.
