Mazty said:
keroncoward said:
Mazty said:
z101 said:
sergiodaly said:
Nem said:
I find it funny how 1.25 CPU is slow and 1.6 is fast. Only in the internet... its those 350Mhz that make the difference!
It might be easier for people to say Nintendo is slow and Microsoft is fast! Its about as obvious that theres no logic to it.
|
3 cores @1.25 is (not a little bit, a lot) slower than 8 or 16 cores @ 1.6
here in the internet and everywhere.
i don't get what is so difficult to understand...
|
Not necessarly. Depends on the CPU tech. And other rumors pointed out that half of the cores will be used for kinect. So it seems true that all next gen consoles will have similar power.
|
If that is true then a basic $600-$700 PC will wipe the floor with all the consoles, which is really just someones laptop and console budget combined.
My 3 year old PC hammers the crap out of the Wii U in everyway and it's using yester-years tech e.g. DDR2 RAM and a phenom II. The consoles are going to have to watch out for the steam box if they really think seriously low-clock speeds are going to give them next-gen capabilities.
|
So much power just to play an exclusive like Farmville. Im happy for you....
|
World of Warcraft? Starcraft? Diablo? Planetside 2?
All games at a true 1080p resolution?
The bigger, better version of BF3?
DX11?
Almost all MMO's are PC only, something you have forgotten....
Oh wait nah u just jelly ^-^
|
Been playing WoW about 4 years.....
I can tell you its not that graphics intensive, more just memory and internet speed.
