haxxiy said:
Did you really need to ask that in your second paragraph? Are you fighting his argument or attacking him without any concrete base whatsoever? Besides, your whole answer, besides a lot of machine gunning directed at the strawman, is mostly based on a "tu quoque" argument; essentially, the old childhood tactic of declaring, “Well, you do it, too!”. |
No, it's pointing out hypocrisy. When you have a double standard for one side, blaming others instead of acknowledging the root of the problem, while declaring total blame on the other side should it happen to them, that's being a hypocrite. Really, you should look it up sometime.
The initial argument was that the media goes out of their way to look for connections to possible terrorist links, (which is their job, by the way). What he pointed out was that doing so is unacceptable if it shows they have connections to conservatives. The truth of the matter is, the DHS predicted right-wing extremism before these occurances, and was thoroughly dismissed. Now that it's happening, they're calling it "media hunt for conservative links". Ohhh no! we cannot blame the conservatives for anything, right?







