Soleron said:
wut http://techreport.com/review/22835/review-intel-core-i7-3770k-ivy-bridge-processor/19 i7 3770K = 225 performance, 4 cores, 3.5GHz base clock Hence Ivy Bridge = (225/160)*(3.6/3.5)*(SQRT(8)/SQRT(4)= more than 2x the per-clock performance of AMD Hence the CPU he chose, i5 3570K, is about twice as fast as the FX-4100 you're suggesting and hence is the better choice even if you had a company preference. That's right, processors with the same core count and clock speed can perform vastly differently! I like AMD but they're extremely dead. |
Well. My Core i7 3930K @ 4.8ghz is about twice as fast as my old Phenom 2 x6 1090T @4ghz+3ghz NB when it comes to encoding, so it's not far off the mark, especially with the Phenom 2 being faster than the FX in single threads, however the Core i7 has Hyper Threading which gives it a boost in such tasks.
As for gaming? I noticed zero difference. (Then again at 5760x1080, it's to be expected.)
If I were to choose a system for gaming and had a choice between the FX 4100 and a Core i7 3570K but the FX had a Radeon 7970 and the i7 had a Radeon 7870 to keep prices similar, I'll go for the FX every damn time, the GPU has the largest impact on games performance these days.
But it's silly to think AMD's chips can't play games, it's simply not true, when the budget calls for it, go for it and get a better GPU or an SSD instead.

www.youtube.com/@Pemalite








