cloud1161 said:
No need to get offensive here. One of the main reasons I chose an AMD processor was because every computer or laptop I've ever owned had Intel processors and I wanted to change things up. I don't hold prejudice over either company unlike alot of people on this site (not saying you do, just some other people hold alot of bias one way or the other). |
wut
http://techreport.com/review/22835/review-intel-core-i7-3770k-ivy-bridge-processor/19
i7 3770K = 225 performance, 4 cores, 3.5GHz base clock
FX-8150 = 160 performance, 8 cores, 3.6GHz base clock
Let us assume, conservatively, that performance scales with square root of core count
Hence Ivy Bridge = (225/160)*(3.6/3.5)*(SQRT(8)/SQRT(4)= more than 2x the per-clock performance of AMD
Hence the CPU he chose, i5 3570K, is about twice as fast as the FX-4100 you're suggesting and hence is the better choice even if you had a company preference.
That's right, processors with the same core count and clock speed can perform vastly differently!
I like AMD but they're extremely dead.







