By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
cloud1161 said:
Soleron said:
cloud1161 said:
 I got my AMD FX 4100 CPU for $95 and it has virtually the same specs as that CPU. It's quad-core 3.6 GHz, 4.1 GHz overclock.

And you're the only reason anyone is buying AMD CPUs these days. It's the old Pentium 4 problem in reverse.

No need to get offensive here.  One of the main reasons I chose an AMD processor was because every computer or laptop I've ever owned had Intel processors and I wanted to change things up.  I don't hold prejudice over either company unlike alot of people on this site (not saying you do, just some other people hold alot of bias one way or the other).

wut

http://techreport.com/review/22835/review-intel-core-i7-3770k-ivy-bridge-processor/19

i7 3770K = 225 performance, 4 cores, 3.5GHz base clock
FX-8150 =  160 performance, 8 cores, 3.6GHz base clock
Let us assume, conservatively, that performance scales with square root of core count

Hence Ivy Bridge = (225/160)*(3.6/3.5)*(SQRT(8)/SQRT(4)= more than 2x the per-clock performance of AMD

Hence the CPU he chose, i5 3570K, is about twice as fast as the FX-4100 you're suggesting and hence is the better choice even if you had a company preference.

That's right, processors with the same core count and clock speed can perform vastly differently!

I like AMD but they're extremely dead.