selnor said:
Aldro said:
selnor said:
Badassbab said:
We don't know if this is 360 footage but if it is then looks pretty amazing.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hnRqQDfmQaM <<<< Apparently that's 360 footage right there. But I'm adopting a wait and see policy. Crysis 2 was far too ambitious on current gen with dodgy AA, pop ins and crappy frame rates. Killzone 2 & especially 3 are still FPS technical accomplishment kings overall though one could argue Halo 4 is better looking in some ways but that's mostly due to art direction.
|
Risking a war.............
Digital Foundry claim that from there technical analysis Halo 4 >>> KZ3. As thats the only reeal site doing technical tests we really have to go with that from a tech point of view. They claim its arueably the best on console so far alongside UC3 and GOW3. They rate GOW3 and UC3 also technicaly better than KZ3.
I think you can only say KZ3 is better artistically as an opinion. BUt technically alo 4 is better accordin to their analysis. so thats more fact.
|
"Technically" Red dead redemption and Skyrim are in the same loop, due to their immense scale.
Yet that's not what we give a rats about, we care about the visual fidelity in which games such as Uncharted being so linear has an advantage in.
Thats the way it just is.
Technically, Skyrim and RDR for example are miles ahead of the ones you list.
Visually though? Heck no.
Killzone is also more linear than Halo, make of that what you wish.
|
was merely pointing out that DF do tests. Which provide evidence. As there is no other thing I can see being done to attempt the guageing of Technicality in visual fidelity in games.
So there is merit in their conclusions.
Anything is else lans way more to opinion. Whereas DF is closest thing to fact.
Make of my analogy what you will.
|
You claim
"Digital Foundry claim that from there technical analysis Halo 4 >>> KZ3."
Not once in their article do they make such a claim. You twist whatever is mentioned and draw very questionable conclusions. That is you in a nutshell here on VGC.
Needless to say, Far Cry 3 is actually leading the pack of this years graphic awards followed by Journey and Halo 4. Whereas the likes of previous years where a game has dominated, this isn't the case this year. Rather funny. DF does indeed make a point. The 360 has a shot at the title, but it sure aint defining anything unlike some other franchises. That is exactly what is being shown right now. The critics are not as impressed. Hell this year didn't even boast a lot of high graphic contenders compared to previous years where games like Killzone, Crysis etc lost.
If you have such a bad angle toward "opinions" you should know that those awards are chosen by the men and women who work and spend their lives playing games and telling others about it. They all hold a vote on editorial staffs and play more games than you ever will. Something I have mentioned several times. When they see something outstanding, they tend to show it.
For someone who twists and makes up own facts based upon agendas they so desperately try to hide, you sure really try hard.
