By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
selnor said:
Badassbab said:

We don't know if this is 360 footage but if it is then looks pretty amazing.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hnRqQDfmQaM <<<< Apparently that's 360 footage right there. But I'm adopting a wait and see policy. Crysis 2 was far too ambitious on current gen with dodgy AA, pop ins and crappy frame rates. Killzone 2 & especially 3 are still FPS technical accomplishment kings overall though one could argue Halo 4 is better looking in some ways but that's mostly due to art direction.

Risking  a war.............

Digital Foundry claim that from there technical analysis Halo 4 >>> KZ3. As thats the only reeal site doing technical tests we really have to go with that from a tech point of view. They claim its arueably the best on  console so far alongside UC3 and GOW3. They rate GOW3 and UC3 also technicaly better than KZ3.

I think you can only say KZ3 is better artistically as an opinion. BUt technically alo 4 is better accordin to their analysis. so thats more fact.

"Technically" Red dead redemption and Skyrim are in the same loop, due to their immense scale.

Yet that's not what we give a rats about, we care about the visual fidelity in which games such as Uncharted being so linear has an advantage in.

Thats the way it just is.

Technically, Skyrim and RDR for example are miles ahead of the ones you list.

Visually though? Heck no.

Killzone is also more linear than Halo, make of that what you wish.