happydolphin said:
| DélioPT said:
@bold. No I don't, I don't pretend to know how many things I haven't seen yet still believe, I don't keep a record of my faith. What is the point of this question?
Sorry, i should have made it clearer. I wasn`t talking about religion. Was thinking about things that people believe like friends, family, etc.
@apparition. What do you mean by "more than just a miracle"?
Just saying that what happened was more than the miracle part. But since you read it, you already know it now. That was all.
All the A, B talk was a way of me saying that something always comes from something, even if the what leads to the creation of a second something is hidden within the first something. More than that, it was my way of saying that things are a product of intelligence... just like in a game.
|
I understand. And I see it like that too. In A, B -> AB, BA, well the missing piece is P, be it an intelligent or an undirected process (random but selective over time).
The next question is, "does P work?".
|
If "P" is the process part, than it needs to exist. To realize potential it needs to become real, hence, "P".
I think that if your starting point is "something from something" than "P" needs to happen. If "nothing creates something", than "P" isn`t necessary no more, because the process is what leads to change. The second suposition is the negation of "P".
