dsgrue3 said:
GameOver22 said:
dsgrue3 said:
GameOver22 said:
War & Ethics: A New Just War Theory by Nicolas Fotion. I don't have a pdf....its an actual book, but the citation is clearly on page 165....it actually cites two wikipedia pages for Chapters 7 and 8.
It surprised me too....that's why I remembered it. Funny thing is....its actually a good read on just war theory.
|
Okay, that's one example. I tried to check it out on Amazon, but it went from 163 to 167, coincidentally. You said texts. That implies more than one. Do you have others?
|
No, typo on my part.
|
Then it's anecdotal fallacy.
|
Are you being serious or facetious? I actually have to make an argument in order for it to be an anecdotal fallacy.....as in I need to argue that an isolated incidence implies some general truth. I just made the simple observation that I've seen an academic cite wikipedia...not that this means academics cite wikipedia all the time.
I mean.....I actually mentioned I was surprised that the book cited wikipedia.....because I've never seen another academic work cite wikipedia.
