the fallacy thread NOW HIRING! fallacy mods!

[Mazty]

dsgrue3 said:

Mazty said:
As you completely ignored what I said:

"But as I have said, the volume of papers required to get you up to scratch on the topics that you have recieved no education on would take you months to read...therefore what do you propose? Are you really saying you'd rather wade through 500+ pages of peer-reviewed work then a quick 1 hour read of a wiki page and taking the time to check the sources?"

 

Assumptions will get you nowhere. Especially fallacious ones without any merit. Anyways, I'm done with this. I've proven that wikipedia isn't credible. And that was my goal. I won't read any other replies about nonsense like this post above.

Your degree was in computer science, not atmospheric sciences or anything to do with the environment and yet you claim to know better then people with doctorates in the field...

You have proven that you are lazy and won't check out references yourself, that's all.