the fallacy thread NOW HIRING! fallacy mods!

[Mazty]

dsgrue3 said:

GameOver22 said:

dsgrue3 said:

GameOver22 said:
War & Ethics: A New Just War Theory by Nicolas Fotion. I don't have a pdf....its an actual book, but the citation is clearly on page 165....it actually cites two wikipedia pages for Chapters 7 and 8.

It surprised me too....that's why I remembered it. Funny thing is....its actually a good read on just war theory.

Okay, that's one example. I tried to check it out on Amazon, but it went from 163 to 167, coincidentally. You said texts. That implies more than one. Do you have others?

No, typo on my part.

Then it's anecdotal fallacy.

No it's evidence that work has used wikipedia in a reference ergo your claim that wikipedia cannot be referenced must be re-evaluated.

Also you apply this limitation, one that only applies to writing papers in some academic establishments, but no others. In otherwords, you're just being lazy and/or pedantic. 

What's the difference between reading wiki and me just dumping you all the references at the bottom of the page for you to read?