dsgrue3 said:
Mazty said:
I'm going to be complete honest here and no offense but just truth is intended with the following. I think the problem is that you're autistic and that you can't accept that when used correctly wiki can be a useful tool due to the symptom of restricted behaviour because no matter what reasoning I present to you, you don't actually logically refute it, you just repeat yourself like a stuck record. Such behaviour leaves me to think that you are limited in your scope for accepting new ideas to such a degree that it is actually a debilitation on your behalf. If you could shed some light on this idea that would be appreciated as I cannot see a need in furthering a point if a party has a literal inability to accept new viewpoints. |
I am not autistic, but thank you for the compliment. Wikipedia is good for a general idea (usually) but not for more complex ideas. And again, they can be edited. So even if Wiki cites a credible document, the text that allegedly came from said document would not necessarily match.
|
Autisim isn't a compliment....That really makes you sound handicapped in some social aspect...
The issue is how can you expect someone to bring another person who is ill-educated up to scratch on a topic? If you aren't even willing to read wiki and it's references, then what chance are you going to have of buying a text book or reading numerous 40 page papers front to back?
