Mazty on 20 December 2012
dsgrue3 said:
His reference was from an about.com atheist section. Not remotely credible. I apologize for failing to realize who you were quoting. |
The issue with that is that you don't seem to have any concrete rules for what is a creditable source. You seem to switch with the wind. No references = not valid. Yet you also pass the bizarro ruling that if something is referenced it's not valid....Until you adopt the accepted method for validating work, as well as realising that not being referenced doesn't instantly discredit an idea, you are just going to be barking "computer says noooo".
