happydolphin said:
You weren't asking if humans have pulations. It was clear from your logic that you were trying to infer that since all animals other than humans have gay populations, that it was natural for humans to have gay populations. Special pleading. |
what spevial pleadinh? how am i moving the goalposts?
i was saying that humans having gay populations was natural. It is a fact that we have gay populations, and that all animals have gay population. I only mis-explained it later when i was sayimg humans are animals and animals are gay. You're right though, my first premise was different , it changed when i was trying to explain to you logically how it makes sense and ended up with a conclusion that didn't follow from the premise, but here you are a victim of fallacy fallacy, because it does actually follow that it is natural for humans to be gay since it is proven that all animals(includong humans) ahave gay populations. that was my original point, as you seem to agree.
You just chose to ignore this.
"just because something was argued incorrectly fdoesn't mean it is wrong"
