happydolphin said:
No I did not misrepresent. I said, that in order to get to his conclusion, he was missing a premise, and that premise was something of the likes of "all species are alike". I don't know exactly what it is since I am not the one constructing the logic, but all I can say is that something is missing. Maybe my wording was off, but I did use the preposition "an" in "an uncertified [...] premise", with the liberty to interpret it as being one of many. |
Wow, if you can't understand simple facts like this, you've a long way to go in terms of logic. I'm tired of beating this dead horse.







