the fallacy thread NOW HIRING! fallacy mods!

[theprof00]

happydolphin said:

theprof00 said:
i haven't said anything incorrect, and im not disputing your arguments based on who you are.
soul air is a term i made up to help elucidate why we can judge what is natural for humans, scientifically, by using other animals, because humans are animals. It is only due to my lack of a good comparison that i used the term.

my sentences not being capitalized has absolutely zero to do with your ability to understand a post.
The sentences not being in paragraphs is likewise irrelevant to comprehension.

@bold. You don't know that.

@Your logic was incorrect, as I've shown. You said that the religious violated the "appeal to nature" and "appeal to authority" rules, and your demonstrations were incorrect, they didn't follow the definitions.

@italics. You're going to have to prove that over time.

yet you were able to read it. Astounding how you just proved yourself wrong. Can you read in all caps? can you read in all lower case? can you read sentences ? then, you should be able to read uncapitalized sentences that at least had line breaks. Had it been a wall of text, you would have a point. But there were linebreaks at the end of each portion, you can check the coding in the html viwer if you like.

The logic is not incorrect. Those fallacies are made. All you've shown is that the other side also uses fallacies. That does not counter my point, nor prove it incorrect.

And I don't  have to prove you anything. You can either take what I'm saying and try to listen, or you can continue thinking that I'm persecuting you. Your choice.