| Desroko said: The Fabian strategy of pinning all your hopes on Texas, Ohio, and Pennsylvania is looking more msguided by the day. I'm ashamed to say that my state, Pennsylvania, looks like Clinton territory so far. But I'm not convinced that Ohio is a slam dunk for Clinton. |
It might have to do with how the Feb 26th debate goes. Columbus shows a 2 to 1 lead for Clinton... but the real votes will be cast in Cleveland. Though maybe it's just me but Ohio's young voters seem a lot more apathetic then most. Well not apathetic. They care a whole lot, go to protests and stuff.
Obama did when a straw poll in Lakewood 2 to 1 back in January. Which is a lot closer to cleveland then Columbus.
They just forget to vote. Or just screw up where they are supposed to go. Of course... this might change since that fraud Blackwell won't have anything to do with the election. That and the lack of black people and the poor being disenfranchised this election might help Obama.
I don't know what's wrong with Ohio's republican party... seems full of crooks. That's the kind of thing you'd think you'd want to avoid in a swing state.
