Alara317 on 19 December 2012
| timmah said: Let me add to it then. It's a theory to explain the fact that life is here, and was not always here. That is the fact, the 'how' and 'why' are not proven facts. This particular theory has multiple unprovable hypothesis to explain how life 'might' have started from non-life. I don't see how that leads to it being a fact. |
Fact or theory, it still has the most substance backing it up. given the lack of time machines, it can never be conclusively proven, but the albiogenesis theories and tests have proven that it is possible, so that's pretty damn substantial evidence. Not sure why such a simple concept (go where the evidence takes you) is vexing you.
