Alara317 said:
it was implied. and hey, if you're so critical of the accepted theory of the origin of life, come up with a better theory! I mean, I've never seen someone argue with established scientific fact that either wasn't a brilliant scientist with a conflicting theory or a religious zealot, and given your criticisms and lack of willingness to accept the simplest of facts without substantial counter-arguments, I'm pretty sure you're not a brilliant scientist. |
I'm only arguing against you calling it a fact. It's a theory. You're free to draw your own conclusions on which theory you like best.