| timmah said: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenesis Please tell me which of the hypothesis in the above article is the 'best possible answer' based on observation and experimentation. If you can, you're smarter than 99% of the scientific community. You can certainly tell me your personal opinion, but none of these is a concrete, provable answer to bridge that gap from non-life to life. Could somebody just come out and acknowledge that Science does not have a solid answer to this question?? |
Abiogenesis is the overlaying theory. It is the consensus of the scientific community. Within abiogenesis there are competing components, but abiogenesis itself is what you really should have asked for.
This article sums up my feelings about intelligent design:
http://www.phy.duke.edu/~rgb/Philosophy/axioms/axioms/node47.html
