Alara317 said:
timmah said:
Throwing in a large amount of time does not automatically make something possible. You're saying it took Billions of years for life to get where it is now, I'm saying we can't even prove that living matter can come from non-living matter, even at the single cell level.
Sure, amino acids can form, we've confirmed that. That still doesn't bridge the gap from non-living matter to living matter. There is still no scientific proof of that at all.
Inorganic chemicals created purposefully by intelligence self-replicated. Ok, so can this happen without us 'making' and 'designing' those chemicals? This still does not prove that life can come from non-life without DESIGN, since those chemicals were specifically designed by intelligent beings (so you're kind of proving my point)
RNA is self-replicating, sure, but that goes back to my point that all life is self-replicating and there is always a precurser of other, pre-existing life. The RNA cannot self-replicate unless RNA already exists.
Not a single example above shows even a single living cell coming from non-living matter.
|
You are aware that they've come very close to recreating albiogenesis in a lab, right? That's where they put all the stuff theorized to be swimming the ocean diring the formative years of our planet, and expose it to the equivalent of volcanic and electric activity to make the proteins and acids combine in such a way to make rudimentary forms of life.
Look it up, kinda devastating to the creationst's case.
|
Yeah I've told him about the Miller-Urey experiment. He seems to think just because it proves that amino acids form without influence from anyone, and form based purely upon the conditions provided, that it does not refute intelligent design. lol
