This is why I don't like debating religion

[dsgrue3]

happydolphin said:

dsgrue3 said:

It isn't a testable hypothesis. I am not claiming anything. And I am telling you that you can't claim anything either. 

You claimed that "Until evidence surfaces supporting your claim that a supernatural being exists, one does not exist", and that was false.

I never claimed God exists, but even if I did you can't say that he doesn't because I haven't had confirmation of it. However, you could try to disprove his existence using other means of logic (like if the story of God is full of inconsistencies, then you would have a point).

I believe everyone in their experience have ran into a case where something existed but they were not aware (and possibly nobody else was aware of its existence), yet when they discovered it they were amazed.

That's because existence is not predicated by confirmation of existence.

I understand. I posted in the other thread about this.

I will modify that quotation to: "Until evidence surfaces supporting your claim that a supernatural being exists, you cannot claim one exists." It's a subtle change, but very impactful.