bananaking21 said:
i actually thought about it quite a lot, and the addition of resistive makes no sense other than reducing the price of the gampad. nintendo them selfs claim that the gamepad adds value to gameplay. so there main reason to add the touch screen was to improve gameplay. and we all know in the middle of a game responsivness is VERY important. a quick and slight tap should be able to register a touch. but resistives technology works against that. it needs to feel pressure not a slight touch and that there will harm nintendo's goal to add value to the gameplay |
Right, like I said, I won't argue about the Wii U because some people are just not used to it and it does run on more proven tech instead of new tech so I can understand that, but you are coming at me with the Wii U, and that wasn't even my discussion since it was focused on the common misconception that somehow capacitive is a lot better than resistive which has been debunked by the tech demo I posted from 2009 as it is very responsive, very accurate, most likely cheaper to produce, and can work with a brush lol. The weaknesses are that resistive are not covered by a gorilla glass and the requirement for stronger back light.
