| happydolphin said: Okay, I can rewire my brain to understand existence as what you defined it as. It is not the word I use when I say "nothing disproves that God exists", it is not the same word as the one you use. The word I use does not imply that "no observation = no (?)existence(?)". -> My question then would be, what is the term used to say it's there but we haven't observed it yet? I've heard of Shrodinger's cat experiment, and read about it a while ago, do you think I should read more about it to understand better? |
It's interesting, but it's probably beyond this discussion. [Schrodinger's cat experiment]
Yeah, you do have to rewire your brain when you confine to a particular definition.
You're using the same term just definining it differently than I am which is fine, but you need to define it first so we can use your definition instead if you want to go that route. But don't expect to debate my definition using yours. That doesn't work.
