dsgrue3 on 18 December 2012
| happydolphin said: The first thing I don't do when defending my points is influencing my reader by using the backing of a scientific community. I argue my points and I let my interlocutor decide for himself. As such I consider that quite disingenuous, but I'll let it slide, let's get back to the topic.
The point I was not making was this: A observes B does not confirm B's existence. That is the point I was not making.
The point I was making was: A does not observe B does not invalidate B's existence.
Do you see the difference? If you do, do you now realize that you were mistaken about my intent and for considering my argument pedantic? |
So you argue based upon your own suppositions as opposed to utilizing the scientific community? Haha, that explains a lot.
Then you were aguing an untestable hypothesis. These are not valid and are completely pointless. So, you did not have a point. As I suspected.
