Smeags said:
Mr Khan said:
Hmm. There would be two easier ways to do it, which could allow for splitting workload
1: Fractions. Number 1 gets 1 point, number 2 gets 1/2 point, number 25 gets 1/25 of a point, and you could just do addition straight across, highest number wins.
2: Inversion, with no account for "game not on list," where number 1 gets 50 points, number 2, 49, and number 49, 2.
Unless you're trying to weight against unique games that don't make multiple appearances?
|
Yeah, the bolded is the system I've been using the past two years. I just want a system that rewards every game on a list, including #50. So I reward consistency across voters.
*shrugs* I've dug my own grave. Might as well enjoy it.
|
Thanks for doing it, Smeags. It's very much appreciated, if that makes the process any easier.