bananaking21 said:
dahuman said:
Mmmfishtacos said:
bananaking21 said:
gergroy said:
spurgeonryan said:
If it makes it more accurate then lets do it! |
it wouldn't, capactive might make touch with your fingers slightly more responsive, but not enough to be that noticeable. However, you would lose the very precise stylus touch.
Capactive touch screens really only make sense if you are adding multi touch. However, like the OP said, Nintendo can't really do that without fracturing their base. So, basically, you would lose more than you would gain if Nintendo did this.
|
slightly more responsive? no its way more responsive
|
It is more responsive and noticeably.
|
Responsiveness depends on the sensitivity dial and the amount of processor power used to register that touch. I've seen plenty of shitty capacitive touch devices just as I've seen a lot of shitty resistive, saying one is more responsive than another is kinda weak since you are not supposed to use them the same way.
|
no, its very well known that capacitve touch screens are miles ahead of resistive touch screens in terms of sensativity. just because you used a crappy capactive touch screen doesnt make them any less superior. fact is wiiU's touch screen is 4 year old tech, simple as that
|
I won't argue about the Wii U since it does run on older tech even though it's very responsive, but if you broaden the perspective of touch screens in general then you would be incorrect and your information is outdated.
