| Dodece said: The dichotomy at play in my post was purely intentional. If I have to explain it to you. Then you will never get it. |
Don't worry, it's not the 'dichotomy' at play in your post I found amusing. As too not fall into the 'If I have to explain it to you, you'll never get it' pattern I will explain to you why I found your initial post delightfully entertaining.
Let me quote one of your opening statements:
"If you don't oppose a line of thought that dehumanizes others. Then the person putting forth that line of thought. Will take your silence as consent, or a confirmation that their ideas are right. Which in the end might lead that person to kill that person that they have dehumanized."
A questinable statement in itself to say the least, but who are we kidding; This is a gaming discussion board on the internet, further leaps in reasoning happens every minute of the day.
Anyhow, later in the very same post you explain how to use 'cheap, underhanded, and needlessly brutal' methods to induce emotional discomfort and errode someones faith. Later brag about planting 'a false profit' (I am assuming you meant prophet?). In other words, your doing a bang up job of dehumanizing your opponents yourself.
That's ironic, and that's also hilarious.
